Income Protection
Compare how income protection and critical illness cover pay out, what they cover and which one actually suits your situation, with no single insurer's product pushed over another.
Income protection insurance pays you a regular, tax-free monthly income if you're unable to work because of almost any illness or injury, from a broken leg to depression or long-term back pain. Critical illness cover works differently: it pays a single tax-free lump sum if you're diagnosed with one of a defined list of serious conditions, typically cancer, a heart attack, a stroke or multiple sclerosis. Both sit within the wider world of income protection insurance style products, but they solve different problems. Income protection replaces your salary for as long as you're too unwell to work, up to a set end date such as your retirement age or a fixed benefit period. Critical illness cover hands you one large sum the moment you meet the policy's definition of a covered condition, whether you use it to clear your mortgage, pay for private treatment or simply cover bills while you recover.
If you want a rough figure for how much cover you'd need before comparing the two, it's worth using a tool to calculate how much cover you need based on your salary, mortgage and existing savings.
Income protection insurance is a long-term policy that replaces part of your salary, usually between 50% and 70% of your gross income, if you're unable to work due to illness or injury. Unlike critical illness cover, it doesn't rely on a specific diagnosis. If a doctor signs you off work and you meet your policy's definition of incapacity, whether that's stress, anxiety, a slipped disc or cancer, the policy pays out. Cover starts after a deferred period (also called a waiting period) that you choose when you take out the policy, typically ranging from 4 weeks to 52 weeks. A shorter deferred period means a higher premium but faster access to your benefit, while a longer one, often matched to any sick pay your employer provides, brings the monthly cost down. Once a claim is accepted, income protection can keep paying out for months or years, in some cases right through to your chosen retirement age, as long as you remain unable to work.
This breadth of cover is the single biggest reason people choose income protection over critical illness cover. Mental health conditions and musculoskeletal problems such as back and joint injuries are consistently among the most common reasons for income protection claims, and both are broadly covered by a standard policy. For a full breakdown of deferred periods, benefit levels and claim triggers, read our guide on how income protection insurance works.
Critical illness cover is a policy that pays a single, tax-free lump sum if you're diagnosed with one of a defined list of serious medical conditions during the policy term. Most UK insurers cover between 30 and 40 specified illnesses, with cancer, heart attack, stroke, multiple sclerosis and organ failure appearing on almost every provider's list. Each condition comes with its own severity definition, so a diagnosis alone doesn't automatically guarantee a payout. Some cancers classed as low grade, or caught at a very early stage, may be excluded or only partially covered depending on the insurer's exact wording, which is why reading the policy's condition definitions before you buy matters as much as comparing the price.
Critical illness cover is frequently sold alongside a mortgage or as an add-on to a life insurance policy, since a lump sum that clears an outstanding mortgage balance following a serious diagnosis is an easy concept for lenders and advisers to recommend. If you're looking at cover linked to a mortgage, it's worth comparing standalone critical illness cover against term life insurance with critical illness cover added, since combined policies can be cheaper than buying two separate plans but usually only pay out once, on whichever claim happens first, rather than twice.
The clearest way to see how these two products differ is side by side. Both are protection insurance policies you buy to guard against the financial impact of falling seriously ill, but the mechanics behind each one are built around a completely different question. Income protection asks whether you're currently able to work, and keeps paying for as long as the answer is no, regardless of exactly what's wrong with you. Critical illness cover asks whether you've been diagnosed with one specific condition from a fixed list, and pays a single fixed sum the moment that diagnosis is confirmed, whether or not you ever stop working at all. This difference in structure explains almost every other distinction between the two products, from typical cost to how claims are assessed. The table below compares income protection and critical illness cover on the factors that matter most when you're deciding which to buy, or whether you might need both.
The single biggest practical difference is breadth versus depth. Income protection is built for breadth: it responds to almost any illness or injury that stops you working, including conditions critical illness cover excludes altogether, like stress, anxiety and most musculoskeletal problems. Critical illness cover is built for depth: it pays a much larger sum in one go, but only for a shortlist of serious, clearly defined conditions. A 35-year-old office worker who injures their back and can't work for four months would likely have a valid income protection claim but no critical illness claim at all, since a bad back rarely meets any insurer's critical illness definitions. Flip the scenario to a stage 2 breast cancer diagnosis and both policies could pay out at the same time: income protection while treatment keeps the person off work, and critical illness cover as an immediate lump sum regardless of whether they end up taking time off at all. Neither product is objectively better; they're built to answer different questions about the same risk.
Critical illness cover is usually the cheaper of the two products for a comparable level of cover, mainly because it only pays out once and only for a defined shortlist of serious conditions, which makes the risk easier for insurers to price. Income protection tends to cost more because it covers a much wider range of triggers, including common, long-duration claims like mental health conditions and back problems, and because a successful claim can keep paying out for years rather than settling once. The figures below are illustrative examples for a non-smoker in average health, based on 25,000 pounds of critical illness cover and an income protection policy covering 60% of a 30,000 pounds salary with a 13-week deferred period. Your actual premium depends on your age, health, occupation, smoker status and the exact cover level and deferred period you choose, so treat these as a starting point for comparison rather than a quote.
Notice how the income protection premium rises more steeply between age 30 and age 50 than critical illness cover does. That's because the risk of a long-term illness claim increases sharply with age, while critical illness pricing is driven more by the fixed list of conditions than by how long a claim might run. Smoker status has a similarly large effect on both products, often adding 50% or more to the premium, since smoking materially increases the risk of several conditions on a typical critical illness list and of long-term sickness absence generally. Your occupation matters too: a builder or roofer will typically pay noticeably more for income protection than an office-based accountant on an identical salary, because manual trades carry a higher statistical chance of a disabling injury, whereas critical illness pricing is far less sensitive to occupation since it's driven by health conditions rather than the physical risks of a specific job. If cost is the main obstacle to buying either policy, our guide to how much income protection insurance costs breaks down every factor that affects your premium and practical ways to bring it down without cutting cover you actually need.
The two products take almost opposite approaches to defining what counts as a valid claim, and this is where most buyers get caught out if they only compare price. Income protection covers any illness or injury that stops you working, judged against your policy's own definition of incapacity, usually either your own occupation or, on cheaper policies, any occupation you're reasonably suited to. That includes conditions critical illness cover doesn't touch at all: stress, anxiety, depression, chronic fatigue, and musculoskeletal problems like a herniated disc, tendonitis or a knee injury that needs surgery. These are also, in practice, some of the most common reasons people claim, so excluding them from a comparison would understate how often income protection actually pays out.
Critical illness cover's condition list is fixed at the point you buy the policy and doesn't expand to match every serious health event you might face. Pre-existing conditions can also affect what either policy will cover from day one, sometimes through a specific exclusion rather than a blanket refusal, so it's worth reading how pre-existing conditions affect your cover before you compare quotes, particularly if you've had a mental health diagnosis or a back problem in the past five years.
There's no single right answer here; the better product depends on what you're actually trying to protect against and how much you can afford to spend each month. The decision framework below maps the two products onto common real-life situations, which tends to be more useful than a generic recommendation to speak to an adviser.
If you're still unsure whether you need cover at all, our guide on whether you actually need income protection walks through the calculation most people skip: comparing your existing sick pay, savings and other cover against how long you could realistically go without an income.
Income protection and critical illness cover are complementary, not either/or, and a large number of policyholders end up claiming on both for the same illness. Take a concrete example: a 42-year-old marketing manager is diagnosed with stage 2 bowel cancer. Her critical illness policy pays out a 100,000 pounds tax-free lump sum within a few weeks of diagnosis, which she uses to overpay her mortgage and cover private consultations her GP surgery couldn't offer quickly enough. Because her treatment and recovery also keep her off work for eight months, her income protection policy separately pays 60% of her salary, roughly 1,800 pounds a month after her 8-week deferred period, for the full period she's signed off. The two payments don't cancel each other out or reduce one another; they're assessed against entirely different policy terms and can run at the same time.
If your budget only stretches to one policy, prioritise based on the decision framework above rather than trying to split a small budget across two thin policies. A single, adequately funded income protection policy generally protects more of the situations you're likely to actually face than a critical illness policy with a low sum insured.
Payouts from both income protection and critical illness cover are generally tax-free when the policy is a personal one that you took out yourself and pay the premiums on from your own taxed income. This applies whether the payout is a monthly income or a lump sum, and it's one of the reasons both products are often better value than they first appear compared with, say, a savings buffer built from taxed income. The position changes if the cover is provided and paid for by your employer as part of a workplace benefit, most commonly group income protection: benefit payments made through payroll under an employer scheme are usually treated as earnings and taxed as income, along with National Insurance in most cases, in the same way your normal salary is. If you're relying on cover provided at work, it's worth checking with your HR team or scheme documentation whether your specific policy pays out gross or net, since the difference materially changes how far the benefit actually stretches month to month.
The right choice between income protection and critical illness cover, or a combination of both, depends on your income, existing sick pay, mortgage size, health history and how much you can comfortably commit each month. Rather than guessing at a cover level, it's worth working through the numbers properly against your actual salary, outgoings and any existing protection you already have through work, then comparing quotes across the whole market rather than accepting the first policy an adviser mentions. Money Saving Advisors compares policies from leading UK providers without pushing a single insurer's product, so the recommendation you get reflects your circumstances rather than a sales target.
If you're weighing up income protection against other protection products beyond critical illness cover, our comparison of income protection vs PPI explains why the two are often confused despite covering very different risks. And remember that every figure in this guide is illustrative: actual premiums, condition lists and policy terms depend on individual underwriting and the provider you choose, so always check the key features document for any policy before you commit, and speak to a regulated financial adviser if you're unsure which combination of cover is right for you.
Yes. The two policies are assessed independently, so a valid claim on one doesn't reduce or affect a claim on the other. Many people hold both: critical illness cover for a lump sum against a serious diagnosis like cancer, and income protection to keep replacing salary for as long as illness or injury, of any kind, keeps them off work. If budget is tight, prioritise based on which risk worries you most.
Critical illness cover is usually cheaper for a similar level of cover, because it only pays out once for a defined list of serious conditions. Income protection typically costs more, from around £12 to £20 a month at age 30 versus £9 to £15 for critical illness cover, since it covers a far wider range of triggers and can pay out for months or years rather than as a single lump sum.
Yes, if a diagnosis like cancer stops you working, income protection will pay out under its general incapacity definition, not because cancer is named on any list. This is different from critical illness cover, which pays specifically because cancer meets its defined severity criteria, regardless of whether you're actually off work. Income protection can pay for as long as you remain unable to work, unlike a one-off critical illness payment.
Neither is objectively better; they answer different needs. Critical illness cover gives you an immediate, large lump sum, often 50,000 to 150,000 pounds, to spend however you choose, including on treatment or clearing debt. Income protection replaces ongoing salary while treatment keeps you off work but doesn't provide a large one-off sum. Many people diagnosed with cancer benefit from having both types of cover in place.
Possibly, yes. Employer-provided income protection usually only replaces part of your salary, commonly 50 to 75%, and stops the moment you leave that job. It also doesn't provide a lump sum for costs like paying off a mortgage after a serious diagnosis. Critical illness cover fills that specific gap independently of your employer, and stays in place regardless of who you work for.
Personal policies that you take out yourself and pay the premiums on from your own taxed income generally pay out tax-free, whether it's a monthly income from income protection or a lump sum from critical illness cover. Employer-provided group income protection works differently: payments made through payroll under a workplace scheme are usually treated as earnings and taxed as income, along with National Insurance, in the same way your regular salary is. Always check your scheme documents to confirm which basis applies to you.
For critical illness cover, a common starting point is your outstanding mortgage balance plus a buffer for treatment costs or lost income during recovery. For income protection, most advisers suggest covering 50 to 70% of your gross salary, since this level is generally accepted by insurers and keeps premiums proportionate. Use a calculator to model your own numbers against your actual outgoings before choosing a figure.
What our clients say
Shortly after I spoke with Anna, she was also very helpful and made it effortless and a nice experience.
Had a really good experience regarding arranging a secured loan. They introduced me to a great advisor. Thanks for the help.
For once a loan transaction without stress and complications. Very impressed and highly recommended.
Thrilled to share my exceptional experience with Money Saving Advisors. The website made it incredibly simple and easy to connect with an advisor. They helped me find the best deal on my remortgage and secured a very competitive interest rate!
Great advice and money saved on mortgage.
I have previously declined a loan of the value I needed from various brokers, but this website found me a reputable broker with surprisingly decent rates.

Compare the types of income protection insurance, from short-term and long-term to own occupation and group cover, to find the right fit for you.

Short-term income protection pays a tax-free income for 6 months to 2 years if you can't work. See costs, cover and how it compares to PPI.

A plain-English guide to group income protection: how it works, what it costs, and whether your workplace cover is enough to protect your income.

See how much income protection insurance costs by age, job and cover level, plus how to find cheaper quotes in 2026.