Income Protection
See how a health condition affects your application, likely costs and cover options, then compare quotes from providers who understand complex medical histories.
Yes, in most cases you can still get income protection insurance with a pre-existing medical condition. Insurers assess the vast majority of applications with a health history and offer terms of some kind rather than an outright refusal. What changes is the shape of the offer: you might get cover on standard terms, cover with a higher premium known as a loading, cover with a specific condition excluded, or a referral to a specialist insurer who focuses on higher-risk applicants. Outright decline is the least common outcome and usually only applies to very recent, severe or unstable conditions.
A pre-existing condition is any illness, injury or health issue you've had symptoms of, sought treatment for, or received medical advice about before your income protection policy starts. Insurers usually apply a back-look period, most commonly the last five years, though some ask about your full medical history depending on the condition and the underwriting style of the policy. This matters because it determines exactly what you need to disclose on your application, and getting it wrong, even accidentally, can affect a claim years later. Understanding how income protection insurance works before you apply helps you see why full disclosure protects you as much as the insurer.
Underwriters build a picture of your risk from your application form, your GP records where requested, and sometimes a telephone medical interview. Four outcomes are realistic once they've reviewed a pre-existing condition, and which one you get depends on specific, checkable factors rather than a gut feeling about your diagnosis. Severity and how well-controlled the condition is matter more than the diagnosis label itself: two people with type 2 diabetes can get very different terms depending on their blood sugar control and whether they've had any complications. Time since your last symptom or treatment is the second biggest factor, since underwriters see a lower ongoing risk the further you are from an active episode. Your treatment history, including medication compliance and any hospital admissions, completes the picture. Many applicants assume a diagnosis automatically means a loading or exclusion, but a condition that's been stable and well-managed for several years often qualifies for standard terms.
Underwriters don't treat all diagnoses the same way, and the difference between two conditions that sound similar can be significant. The table below sets out how insurers commonly approach the conditions most often disclosed on UK income protection applications, based on typical outcomes rather than any single insurer's exact criteria. Mental health conditions are assessed on frequency of episodes, time off work taken and whether treatment is ongoing, while physical conditions like back pain or diabetes are judged more on physical test results and specialist reports. A cancer diagnosis is treated very differently depending on the type, stage and how long you've been in remission, with many insurers reviewing cases individually after two to five years clear. None of this is a guarantee. Every case is underwritten on its own facts, and the same condition can produce different outcomes at different insurers, which is exactly why comparing quotes across the market matters more here than for a standard application.
The type of underwriting your policy uses changes how a pre-existing condition is handled, and it's a choice that matters far more for applicants with a health history than for those without one. Full medical underwriting assesses your health in detail at the point of application, using your answers, GP records or a medical exam to set your terms upfront, so you know exactly where you stand before you commit. Moratorium underwriting skips the detailed health questions at outset and instead automatically excludes any condition you've had in a set period before the policy starts, commonly five years, with a review after typically two years of continuous cover to see if it can be added back in. Guaranteed premium policies fix your rate for the life of the policy, which can suit applicants with a condition likely to worsen, since your premium won't rise even if your health does. Full medical underwriting tends to suit applicants with a stable, well-documented history who want certainty from day one, while moratorium underwriting suits those who want faster cover with less paperwork and are prepared to accept an initial exclusion.
A pre-existing condition doesn't automatically make income protection unaffordable, but it typically pushes your premium above the standard rate through a loading, expressed as a percentage added to what you'd pay without the condition. Loadings for mild, well-controlled conditions such as treated high blood pressure often sit in the 25-50% range. Moderate conditions with more active management, like diabetes with good control, tend to attract loadings of 50-100%. Severe or higher-risk conditions, including recent cardiovascular events or poorly controlled conditions, can see loadings of 100-300% or occasionally more, and in these cases a specialist insurer often offers better value than a mainstream provider's loaded rate. To put this in real terms, a 40-year-old office worker who'd pay around £35 a month for standard income protection cover might see that rise to £44-52 a month with a mild loading, £53-70 a month with a moderate loading, or £70-140 a month or more at a severe loading, depending on the insurer and the exact condition. Understanding how much income protection costs for standard applicants gives you a useful baseline before you see how your own health history changes the number.
Yes, but it's the exception rather than the rule, and a decline from one insurer rarely means every insurer will say no. Outright decline usually happens only where a condition is very recent, unstable, or where several serious conditions combine to create a risk profile that mainstream insurers aren't set up to price. If you're declined or heavily loaded by a high-street insurer, your next step is usually a specialist or impaired-risk insurer who underwrites higher-risk applicants as their core business rather than an exception. A moratorium-style policy is worth considering too, since it defers the detailed underwriting decision and may accept you with an initial exclusion rather than a decline. If you're self-employed and declined, group cover through a future employer or a guaranteed-acceptance product can be a fallback, though cover levels are usually lower. It's also worth comparing income protection against alternatives directly, since income protection vs critical illness cover can have very different underwriting outcomes for the same health condition, and one may be more accessible to you than the other.
Some insurers focus specifically on applicants that mainstream providers find harder to price, and using a broker with access to the whole market matters more here than for a standard application, since terms for the same condition can vary enormously between insurers. The Exeter is well known in the UK market for underwriting applicants with more complex medical histories, including cancer history and chronic conditions, often on more favourable terms than a generalist insurer would offer. Friendly societies and mutual insurers, including Holloway Friendly and similar organisations, also have a track record of taking on applicants that larger insurers decline, partly because their underwriting teams handle a higher volume of impaired-risk cases. Mainstream insurers such as Aviva, LV= and Vitality still accept plenty of pre-existing conditions on loaded or excluded terms, so a specialist isn't always your best or only route. The real advantage of working with a whole-of-market broker is that they know which insurer's underwriting team tends to look favourably on your specific condition, rather than you applying blind and collecting declines.
Applying with a pre-existing condition takes a bit more preparation than a standard application, but the process itself follows the same six steps whether you're in good health or managing an ongoing condition. Working through these in order reduces the chance of delays or a decision you weren't expecting.
Leaving a condition off your application, even one that feels irrelevant or long in the past, can void your policy entirely if it comes to light during a claim, sometimes years after you took the policy out. This is treated as misrepresentation rather than a technicality, and the Association of British Insurers' guidance on disclosure is clear that insurers can refuse a claim, or in serious cases the whole policy, where relevant information was withheld. It doesn't matter whether the omission was deliberate or simply forgotten. Insurers investigate GP records as standard practice when a claim is made, so an undisclosed condition is very likely to surface at exactly the moment you need your policy to pay out. If you're unsure whether something needs declaring, the safer approach is always to disclose it and let the underwriter decide its relevance, rather than making that judgement yourself. Understanding how to claim on your income protection policy makes clear just how much the accuracy of your original application matters when a claim is eventually assessed.
The only reliable way to know your real terms is to compare quotes from multiple providers, because the same disclosed condition can produce a decline at one insurer and standard terms at another. Rather than applying speculatively and collecting refusals on your record, get quotes through a broker who can check likely outcomes across several insurers before you formally apply, which protects your application history from repeated declines. This matters even more with a health condition than for a standard application, since one insurer's underwriting team might specialise in exactly the type of case you're bringing them, while another simply doesn't see enough of it to price it well. A broker who works across the whole market can often tell you, informally and before you commit to a full application, which two or three insurers are realistically worth approaching for your specific diagnosis.
Start by working out roughly how much cover you need using our calculate how much cover you need tool, then get matched with providers suited to your specific health history. Getting this comparison right the first time, rather than applying piecemeal to individual insurers, is the single biggest factor in getting a fair outcome when you have a pre-existing condition to declare.
Yes. A decline from one insurer doesn't mean every insurer will refuse you, since underwriting criteria and risk appetite for specific conditions vary significantly between providers. Many applicants declined by a mainstream insurer are accepted by a specialist or impaired-risk insurer, sometimes with a loading or exclusion rather than standard terms. Using a whole-of-market broker before you reapply helps you target insurers more likely to accept your specific condition, rather than risking a second decline with the same type of provider.
It depends on the underwriting type. Under a moratorium policy, an excluded condition is typically reviewed after around two years of continuous cover with no symptoms or treatment, and can be added back in if you've stayed well. Under full medical underwriting, an exclusion is usually permanent unless you ask the insurer to review it and provide updated medical evidence showing the condition has resolved or significantly improved.
Yes, if you've had symptoms, sought advice, or had tests, even without a formal diagnosis. Insurance application questions typically ask about symptoms and consultations, not just confirmed diagnoses, so a condition still under investigation must be disclosed. Leaving it off because it isn't official yet is a common cause of non-disclosure disputes at claim stage, since insurers request full GP records and will see the consultation regardless of whether a diagnosis was ever confirmed.
Yes. Income protection pays a regular income if illness or injury stops you working, and underwriters focus on how a condition affects your ability to work over time. Critical illness cover pays a lump sum on diagnosis of specific serious conditions, and underwriters focus more heavily on future diagnosis risk for conditions like cancer or heart disease. The same health history can produce very different terms across the two products, so it's worth comparing both.
Yes, though self-employed applicants typically need to provide more evidence of income, such as two to three years of accounts or tax returns, alongside their medical disclosure. Insurers assess the health condition in the same way as for employed applicants, but self-employed applicants without sick pay from an employer often benefit more from getting cover in place, even at a loaded premium, since they have less financial safety net if illness stops them working.
A straightforward application with minor history is often decided within days. A complex history requiring a GP report typically adds two to four weeks, since insurers wait for your practice to respond, and GP surgeries can take several weeks to process requests. Applications requiring a specialist medical report or additional tests can take six to eight weeks in total. Applying early, well before you need cover to start, avoids being left without protection during this wait.
Not under most individual income protection policies, since your premium is set at the outset based on your disclosed health at that time and doesn't change if your condition later worsens, provided you didn't misrepresent anything on application. This differs from reviewable policies where premiums can increase over time. Guaranteed premium income protection policies make this certain by fixing your rate for the full term regardless of future health changes.
What our clients say
Shortly after I spoke with Anna, she was also very helpful and made it effortless and a nice experience.
Had a really good experience regarding arranging a secured loan. They introduced me to a great advisor. Thanks for the help.
For once a loan transaction without stress and complications. Very impressed and highly recommended.
Thrilled to share my exceptional experience with Money Saving Advisors. The website made it incredibly simple and easy to connect with an advisor. They helped me find the best deal on my remortgage and secured a very competitive interest rate!
Great advice and money saved on mortgage.
I have previously declined a loan of the value I needed from various brokers, but this website found me a reputable broker with surprisingly decent rates.

Compare the types of income protection insurance, from short-term and long-term to own occupation and group cover, to find the right fit for you.

Compare self-employed income protection: how it works, what it costs, and how sole traders, directors and contractors prove income to claim.

Compare income protection and critical illness cover: what each pays out, what's covered, real cost ranges, and which one actually suits you.

See how much income protection insurance costs by age, job and cover level, plus how to find cheaper quotes in 2026.